Humans have caused 1.5 °C of long-term global warming according to new estimates

Re:Humans have caused 1.5 °C of long-term global warming acc... by layer8 on Sunday November 17, 2024 @04:18PM (#42167376)

> I am not coming at it from a moral view, simply a practical one: I don’t think many people can sustain this dissonance.

This is assuming that the dissonance is hurting more than the renunciation. People are already quite good at ignoring dissonances. And the causal effects are so removed from daily experience that often there isn’t that great of a dissonance in the first place.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Humans have caused 1.5 °C of long-term global warming acc... by Vegenoid on Sunday November 17, 2024 @04:24PM (#42167430)

> This is assuming that the dissonance is hurting more than the renunciation.

It’s not about “the dissonance is painful, so they seek to correct it by not voting for reduced consumption”.

It’s “voting to reduce consumption takes effort, in knowing what to vote for and in actually casting a vote, and people are unlikely to put in that effort if they are not putting in any effort elsewhere”.

“Dissonance” was a poor choice of words for what I was trying to communicate.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Humans have caused 1.5 °C of long-term global warming acc... by layer8 on Sunday November 17, 2024 @04:29PM (#42167471)

I thought you were talking about the dissonance of voting for renunciation while not voluntarily renouncing until forced by the system. I don’t think it’s uncommon.

[ Parent | on HN ]