News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Managing High Performers by hershey890 on Sunday November 17, 2024 @01:30PM (#42165885)
I’m at a FAANG right now and this couldn’t be further from the truth.

We basically bought out a ton of A- to A+ players from the rest of the industry and there are many high performers developing entire modules of core functionality themselves with a team of juniors and contractors supporting them. I also have a hunch they make $350-$750k.

Re:Managing High Performers by krtlandt on Sunday November 17, 2024 @01:36PM (#42165938)
Didn't they make John Carmack leave? Obviously I do not know Meta's internal projects, but the open source ones often have a poor quality and the main metric appears to be LOC (or KLOC in the case of those geniuses).
Re:Managing High Performers by shermantanktop on Sunday November 17, 2024 @01:51PM (#42166051)
“High performers” in this article mean, to me, something like the 5% best.

John Carmack is not a “high performer.” He’s in the vanishly small <0.001%. We all know his name, and what he did and where he works.