News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Generative AI doesn't have a coherent understanding of th... by furyofantares on Friday November 15, 2024 @11:28AM (#42148390)
Have you been balking at video game AI this whole time? At chess engines when they were pure search? Or at chess engines now?

It's actually long been noted that the bar keeps rising, that when we figure something out it stops being called AI by a lot of people. I don't think that's individuals raising their bar necessarily though, but stuff becomes more mainstream or younger people being introduced to it.

Re:Generative AI doesn't have a coherent understanding of th... by armada651 on Friday November 15, 2024 @12:25PM (#42148912)
The bar keeps raising because the term used for it promises human-level intelligence from a machine.

The same thing could be said about Virtual Reality where the bar raises each time the tech gets closer to making VR indistinguishable from reality.

Re:Generative AI doesn't have a coherent understanding of th... by _heimdall on Friday November 15, 2024 @12:55PM (#42149222)
I've never considered chess engines or video games to have AI, I guess in that sense you could say I balked at it.

> It's actually long been noted that the bar keeps rising, that when we figure something out it stops being called AI by a lot of people.

That's interesting, I've seen it the other way around. In the 90s I don't remember anything related to AI depicting something as simple as fancy text prediction or human-like speech. Going back further and Hal from Space Odyssey didn't seem like an AI that was just predictive text.

Its always possible my expectations were born from science fiction and not academic research, but that's a pretty big gap if academics considered AI to only require natural language processing and text prediction.

Re:Generative AI doesn't have a coherent understanding of th... by MiguelX413 on Friday November 15, 2024 @03:47PM (#42150823)
I also never considered chess engines or video games to have AI.