Re:Large language models in national security applications
by joe_the_user on Tuesday November 12, 2024 @02:45PM
(#42118930)
Oh, national security professionals aren't going to be talking about psyops, offensive applications and etc, because such things make a given state look bad - they're an offense against democracy and respect for facts and they make the overt media of a given nation look bad. But hey, leave it to HN commentators to root for taking the gloves off. Not to worry post, I'd bet dollars to donuts the actual classified discussions of such things aren't worried about such niceties. But even more, in those activities of the US and other secret states, that have come to light, these state have propagandized not only enemy populations but also their own. After, have to counter enemies trying to nefariously prevent wars as well.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Large language models in national security applications
by davisp on Tuesday November 12, 2024 @07:43PM
(#42121700)
I honestly can’t decide if this comment is written by AI or the moral equivalent of a distracted driver.
Overt media of a given nation.
Not to worry post
Classified discussions (could be me not being in natsec, but the only time I’ve heard this phrase is in movies)
After, have to counter enemies trying to nefariously prevent wars as well (I am unable to determine a possible typo that makes this sentence make sense)