News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:GPTs Are Maxed Out by BoxedEmpathy on Monday November 11, 2024 @01:52PM (#42109507)
That's doesn't seem like a measurable or testable definition.

How do we know if bees understand what they're doing? It's agreed that they display intelligence and intelligent behavior, but not by your definition.

If it's not measurable or testable then it's not useful.

Re:GPTs Are Maxed Out by robertlagrant on Monday November 11, 2024 @02:16PM (#42109677)
But the term may just not be useful. If I record a billion conversations and record the statistically most likely answers to statements people make, it's going to make a reasonable facsimile of a conversation. Is that now anything like intelligence, artificial or otherwise?
Re:GPTs Are Maxed Out by thornewolf on Monday November 11, 2024 @02:50PM (#42109942)
simply put, yes.
Re:GPTs Are Maxed Out by Jensson on Monday November 11, 2024 @10:43PM (#42112593)
So Akinator is now an intelligence?
Re:GPTs Are Maxed Out by glassounds on Monday November 11, 2024 @02:01PM (#42109570)
It's not measurable externally perhaps if the mechanism sufficiently mimics intelligence, but I'd argue that to do that the mechanism actually needs to answer at least some of the criteria above. It's also not necessarily something you can't measure depending on how the AI is built and what it exposes.

Are bees intelligent or do we use the same language in this case as "intelligent design", i.e. the behavior is complex and impressive?

Also this murkier for animals since they do possess some of the traits I mentioned like learning.

Although as I said this was off the top of my head, not an official definition.