Re:The evolution of nepotism in academia, 1088-1800
by MichaelZuo on Saturday November 09, 2024 @08:11AM
(#42094225)
Alright then leave, I’m not going to substantially engage with someone trying to deceive readers.
Edit: Consider yourself lucky I’m not requesting a mod to ban this account ‘Retric’ for deception.
Re:The evolution of nepotism in academia, 1088-1800
by Retric on Saturday November 09, 2024 @11:57AM
(#42095435)
That’s not how things operate here. Note how your complaint isn’t in the guidelines. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html
The site encourages people to delete unproductive comments that haven’t been responding to as it improves the reading experiences for 3rd parties. Which is one of the reasons there’s a big old delete button and you can edit posts for a full hour.
Adding “Edit:” is important for clarity when a post has been responded to, without that it’s just clutter.
Re:The evolution of nepotism in academia, 1088-1800
by MichaelZuo on Saturday November 09, 2024 @01:08PM
(#42095831)
I’m not going to substantially engage with you. Period.
Re:The evolution of nepotism in academia, 1088-1800
by Retric on Monday November 11, 2024 @08:06PM
(#42111941)
You never did meaningfully engage anywhere in the thread.
That’s the issue.
I’m not convinced you’re capable of meaningful dialogue.
Re:The evolution of nepotism in academia, 1088-1800
by MichaelZuo on Wednesday November 13, 2024 @07:55AM
(#42125657)
Nobody’s going to trust the word of a proven deceiver… but if you want to burn away your account then I won’t stop you.
Your behavior is simply unworthy of attempting an intellectual discussion.