Re:Ambulance hits cyclist, rushes him to hospital, then stic...
by preisschild on Friday November 08, 2024 @06:09AM
(#42085938)
This happens when there is no bike lane. Cyclists take the pavement because the street is unsafe.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Ambulance hits cyclist, rushes him to hospital, then stic...
by instig007 on Saturday November 09, 2024 @04:35AM
(#42093463)
Cyclists shouldn't take the pavements whatever the reason, they operate a higher risk vehicles, and spreading those risks on pedestrians who didn't chose to pick a higher risk for the purpose of moving around is exactly the disrespectul attitude I mentioned in my original comment.
Re:Ambulance hits cyclist, rushes him to hospital, then stic...
by enriquto on Tuesday November 12, 2024 @04:42PM
(#42120026)
> they operate a higher risk vehicles
Are you serious? How can you say that? Cars are, by themselves, much higher risk than bikes. If bikes are dangerous at all is because of cars. The main--heck, I'd say the only--spreaders of dangerosity are cars. In a car-free city, none of the main causes of premature death would be traffic-related.