Re:QNX is now free for anything non-commercial, plus there's...
by justin66 on Thursday November 07, 2024 @05:02PM
(#42081587)
That's not a great example. Maintaining a full fork of QNX would not be terribly complex compared to maintaining a full fork of Chromium. The latter targets standards which are moving and evolving. Nobody cares which version of POSIX QNX is compatible with. (Also, Chromium is much bigger)
I think a fork could have some maintainers. I'd be more worried about people wanting to put new features in than anything else.
I think a fork could have some maintainers. I'd be more worried about people wanting to put new features in than anything else.