Re:Linux Syscall Support
by n_plus_1_acc on Thursday November 07, 2024 @07:59AM
(#42076256)
Do I understand correctly that nolibc is just another implementation of the C standard library in terms of Linux syscalls? Comparably to, say, musl libc?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Linux Syscall Support
by oguz-ismail on Thursday November 07, 2024 @08:16AM
(#42076378)
No it's not comparable to musl libc. Standard I/O functions don't support buffering and the prinf implementation can't print floats.
glibc is a space shuttle, musl is a hatchback, nolibc is a skateboard
They all do the same thing (take you from A to B), but offer different levels of comfort, efficiency and utility :)
Who can take their space shuttle to work these days, what with the price of rocket fuel‽
It's a bit unwieldy, but the good thing is that it comes for free with your copy of GNU/Linux!
And parking is always a nightmare for my shuttles
Apparently almost every linux app
And passenger safety?
Re:Linux Syscall Support
by fallingsquirrel on Thursday November 07, 2024 @11:56AM
(#42078416)
In a head-on collision, the space shuttle passengers will fare better than the hatchback. Even so, it wouldn't be my first choice for most destinations.