News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Australia proposes ban on social media for those under 16 by omeid2 on Wednesday November 06, 2024 @11:37PM (#42073453)
Voting rights should be proportional to remaining quality-adjusted life years remaining based on life expectancy.

I am joking of course, but there is something to ponder about the growing number of childless people over 40 voting with little concern for the long term.

Re:Australia proposes ban on social media for those under 16 by Nursie on Thursday November 07, 2024 @12:00AM (#42073556)
As a childless person over 40, wtf are you talking about?

People don't all vote purely on self-interest, some of us vote on how we think human society should be run, and what we think is genuinely best for everyone. Not just for our own immediate bottom line.

This whole ageist line of reasoning is pretty offensive.

Re:Australia proposes ban on social media for those under 16 by kortilla on Thursday November 07, 2024 @12:57AM (#42073836)
It’s not ageism so much as they are prejudiced against people not raising children.

We childless folk have had a quiet 25ish years and now the pendulum seems to be swinging back the other direction. I’ve noticed quite an uptick in memes about childless people being selfish monsters and taking away our voting rights is right in line with that.

Re:Australia proposes ban on social media for those under 16 by kredd on Thursday November 07, 2024 @03:15AM (#42074663)
Doesn’t really matter when the percentage of childless adults is growing every year. I just scoff and move on.
Re:Australia proposes ban on social media for those under 16 by omeid2 on Thursday November 07, 2024 @02:19AM (#42074342)
Exceptio probat regulam.
Re:Australia proposes ban on social media for those under 16 by Nursie on Thursday November 07, 2024 @02:44AM (#42074478)
No, I don't believe I am particularly an exception, I believe you're just exhibiting prejudice.
Re:Australia proposes ban on social media for those under 16 by omeid2 on Thursday November 07, 2024 @02:59AM (#42074567)
Yes, not a snowflake for sure, but as you say "people don't all vote purely on self-interest" but most do.
Re:Australia proposes ban on social media for those under 16 by Nursie on Thursday November 07, 2024 @03:15AM (#42074665)
I'm not sure that's particularly true.

And it still doesn't come close to justifying taking away someone's input to democracy. I find all these discussions massively distasteful.

Also short-sighted because they tend to assume that the age cohort making the claim have more stake in the future, are all of one mind, are thinking long term themselves, or are generally going to do things better. None of these things hold up to much scrutiny AFAICT.

Re:Australia proposes ban on social media for those under 16 by omeid2 on Thursday November 07, 2024 @04:48AM (#42075202)
Claims about "all" are not useful and a distraction from useful understanding of human behaviour. People, like any animal, as a rule, act largely on self-interest. That is with a broad definition of self that includes family --specially offsprings, and larger "identities" like clan, village, city, country, race, creed, religion, and so on.
Re:Australia proposes ban on social media for those under 16 by Nursie on Thursday November 07, 2024 @09:16PM (#42083455)
> That is with a broad definition of self that includes family --specially offsprings, and larger "identities" like clan, village, city, country, race, creed, religion, and so on.

In which case the entire conversation is moot.

Re:Australia proposes ban on social media for those under 16 by rrrrrrrrrrrryan on Thursday November 07, 2024 @01:14AM (#42073922)
Old people with children vote for policies that favor their specific children.

Old people without children vote for policies that favor the next generation.

Re:Australia proposes ban on social media for those under 16 by omeid2 on Thursday November 07, 2024 @04:53AM (#42075226)
No one cares about a race without a horse in it.
Re:Australia proposes ban on social media for those under 16 by tgv on Thursday November 07, 2024 @03:40AM (#42074825)
It's hard to stay polite in discussions where people use the guise of irony to say things they know they shouldn't. You have no evidence for your proposal, and I bet you can't even argue why it would be a net positive, without resorting to prejudice.

In case you couldn't quite parse that, I mean: fuck your comment.