News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Former President Trump is projected to win the presidency by karencarits on Wednesday November 06, 2024 @04:02AM (#42058304)
You would have to provide a better and more precise definition of "stupid" then, the word has a tendency to become circular
Re:Former President Trump is projected to win the presidency by bogle on Wednesday November 06, 2024 @04:13AM (#42058412)
Perhaps you could use the word "idiot" and refer to them as "idiots". The term has been used in a medico-legal context in the past to define a person's mental age.

That there is a divide between the two parties and the average intellectual ability of their supporters is a well-known fact. I'd contest that this is less of an issue than their racism.

Re:Former President Trump is projected to win the presidency by econ40432 on Wednesday November 06, 2024 @04:19AM (#42058480)
Engineering students are actually more conservative than a group like communications majors. Are communications majors smarter?
Re:Former President Trump is projected to win the presidency by bogle on Wednesday November 06, 2024 @05:06AM (#42059133)
I was moving the point away from a measure of smartness to one of racism. I do hope you haven't just damned all the other engineers on HN!
Re:Former President Trump is projected to win the presidency by DeathArrow on Wednesday November 06, 2024 @05:09AM (#42059180)
So you really think more than half of the Americans are mentally impaired? The probability of being mentally impaired is higher for a random poster like you than for half of American people.
Re:Former President Trump is projected to win the presidency by bogle on Wednesday November 06, 2024 @05:35AM (#42059578)
Your understanding of statistics is deplorable. Also, your reading ability. I specifically said it's racism, rather than the (verifiable) lack of intelligence.
Re:Former President Trump is projected to win the presidency by Tainnor on Wednesday November 06, 2024 @04:11AM (#42058399)
True, "stupid" is a very imprecise term. But my main point was merely that epistemically, there is no validity to something just because a majority is behind it.