Re:New York Times Tech Workers Go on Strike
by FirmwareBurner on Monday November 04, 2024 @12:34PM
(#42043941)
Why wouldn't it be? Businesses doing pro-business things are the main reason well paying jobs exist. And people love well paying jobs rather than poor paying jobs.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:New York Times Tech Workers Go on Strike
by drawkward on Monday November 04, 2024 @12:38PM
(#42043987)
I am making no claim about what the comment bias should be here on HN. I am merely reporting it to the parent comment.
Re:New York Times Tech Workers Go on Strike
by matsemann on Monday November 04, 2024 @01:03PM
(#42044290)
That's a very loaded way of putting it.
[dead]
Re:New York Times Tech Workers Go on Strike
by FirmwareBurner on Monday November 04, 2024 @01:08PM
(#42044347)
Government is in charge of regulating the minimum wage. Private companies are in charge of bidding for the "maximum wage", they have no obligation for providing a minimum as they serve their shareholders not the public, the government serves the public.
Re:New York Times Tech Workers Go on Strike
by miltonlost on Monday November 04, 2024 @01:11PM
(#42044376)
Oh honey, do you know what lobbying is? Or how Republicans get their funding? Or what dark money is? Private companies and their private interests have a vested interest in keeping minimum wage low, and exploit campaign finance to do so. (And they also bribe judges with vacations and speaking engagements and RVs.) Just because it's not the Wal-mart CEO deciding it himself does not mean that companies as whole don't do pro-business things and aren't the ones pulling the strings of their GOP puppets.
Re:New York Times Tech Workers Go on Strike
by drawkward on Monday November 04, 2024 @01:11PM
(#42044385)
>Private companies are in charge of bidding for the "maximum wage", they have no obligation for providing a minimum as they serve their shareholders not the public, the government serves the public.
This doesn't support your point the way you think it might.