Re:Cash: An absurdly small jQuery alternative for modern bro...
by nedt on Sunday November 03, 2024 @06:40AM
(#42032496)
querySelectorAll() isn't live. So you could do what I very often do and already convert the result to an array, i.e.
Reason why I do that very often is because it allows all array methods to be used on the result, like .map() or .filter(), which makes it feel very much like jQuery. YMMV
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Cash: An absurdly small jQuery alternative for modern bro...
by theandrewbailey on Sunday November 03, 2024 @07:54AM
(#42032783)
NodeList.prototype.__proto__ = Array.prototype;
Problem solved without Array.from().
Re:Cash: An absurdly small jQuery alternative for modern bro...
by cr125rider on Sunday November 03, 2024 @08:16AM
(#42032898)
Does the underlying data structure work okay with that? I would assume there is some sort of lazy iterator involved that may not work with array methods, or only work once.
This is JavaScript though…
Re:Cash: An absurdly small jQuery alternative for modern bro...
by jazzypants on Sunday November 03, 2024 @09:36AM
(#42033285)
Prototype pollution is bad. We learned this over a decade ago.
Re:Cash: An absurdly small jQuery alternative for modern bro...
by mg on Sunday November 03, 2024 @09:51AM
(#42033366)
Good point!
I wonder what I would have to look for in my codebase in terms of what could break when dqsA starts returning an array instead of a NodeList?
Re:Cash: An absurdly small jQuery alternative for modern bro...
by WorldMaker on Monday November 04, 2024 @02:35PM
(#42045245)
The versions of those methods (map/filter/reduce/etc) that support any iterator (including upgrading NodeList "for free") have passed Stage 4 of the process, which means they will be in the next version of the standard and already starting to show up in some browsers.