Re:Universe would die before monkey with keyboard writes Sha...
by jdthedisciple on Friday November 01, 2024 @06:20AM
(#42015536)
You are just repeating the point that was being argued against.
If the lifetime of the universe isn't enough to randomly produce Shakespeare, 3-4 billions of years are cute but useless to randomly produce anything even near as sophisticated as our 46 chromosome set.
I imagine Dawkins still just repeats the conjecture "but it's 3-4 billion years, anything can happen!"
Re:Universe would die before monkey with keyboard writes Sha...
by danparsonson on Friday November 01, 2024 @06:39AM
(#42015618)
A work of Shakespeare is a single specific target, that's why it takes so long to hit it - one letter out doesn't cut it. DNA meanwhile is a general purpose animal kit that has many billions of 'correct answers'. It's not about sophistication.
Re:Universe would die before monkey with keyboard writes Sha...
by jdthedisciple on Friday November 01, 2024 @09:58AM
(#42016972)
it's not about the absolute number of correct answers
it's about the ratio of valid / invalid answers
which is somewhere very close to 0
Re:Universe would die before monkey with keyboard writes Sha...
by danparsonson on Friday November 01, 2024 @07:54PM
(#42022780)
[citation needed]
What are the numbers?
I suggest you read 'the blind watchmaker' by Dawkins to answer your other question.