Everything you need to know about Machine Learning in 30 minutes or less

Re:Everything you need to know about Machine Learning in 30 ... by marcelsalathe on Wednesday July 04, 2012 @08:12PM (#4201243)

Nice talk. The example of google translate is not a good one though. Say you translate from language A to language B with 99% accuracy, and vice versa, which would be pretty awesome, you'd still have a substantial quality decay after only a few back and forth translations (0.99^x where x is the number of translation steps).

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Everything you need to know about Machine Learning in 30 ... by vecter on Wednesday July 04, 2012 @09:02PM (#4201334)

That's not a very realistic model of communication. If A communicates to B with 99% accuracy in the text, it's likely that B will 100% understand what's going. He will reply back to A with a 100% accurate message that's 99% accurate after translation, and so forth.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Everything you need to know about Machine Learning in 30 ... by marcelsalathe on Wednesday July 04, 2012 @10:23PM (#4201502)

I agree. But my impression was that she took the fact that google translate rapidly decays into gibberish as an indication that it's not doing a good enough job. I don't think you can argue that exactly because google translate does not have the interpretation capability.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Everything you need to know about Machine Learning in 30 ... by hmason on Thursday July 05, 2012 @12:12AM (#4201715)

Don't read too much into that example -- I chose it as a humorous metaphor, not a mathematical argument, and I messed up the delivery in the talk, anyway.

I'll refine the example for the next time!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Everything you need to know about Machine Learning in 30 ... by orenmazor on Thursday July 05, 2012 @01:37AM (#4201867)

I'm really interested in doing more machine learning work (my current projects, as interesting as they are, dont really require it).

I've done a few weirdo projects with NLTK, tho, and its great fun. By stream hacking do you mean offloading learning sets (active or initial) and that heavy overhead into the "cloud", or am I misunderstanding the terminology?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Everything you need to know about Machine Learning in 30 ... by hmason on Thursday July 05, 2012 @11:18PM (#4206188)

In most data analysis work, we assume that the data resides in some database and that you have the luxury of iterating over that data as many times as you like to get to a final result.

The challenge with stream analysis is that you are dealing with a continuous stream of data where you can see each element of the stream only one time and must still be able to cluster/classify/analyze it. There are still few algorithms and tools designed explicitly for that purpose.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Everything you need to know about Machine Learning in 30 ... by ninjin on Thursday July 05, 2012 @05:12AM (#4202300)

Not that I am doing Machine Translation (MT), but saying accuracy is a bit vague. The whole notion of what is lost in a translation using MT is to the best of my knowledge not fully captured with any well-established measure.

Fair warning, I haven't had time to have a look at the video (short break at work). I'll do it once I get home.

[ Parent | on HN ]