News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Is Patrick Mackenzie's salary negotiation guide relevant ... by lotsofpulp on Thursday October 31, 2024 @11:05AM (#42007652)
Why does that matter? I would like to see a sentence or scenario where “BATNA” is not interchangeable with “alternative” or “option” or some other synonym.

I read the Wikipedia page, but I’m still unclear what information I gain from BATNA over just “best alternative” or “second best option/choice”.

Re:Is Patrick Mackenzie's salary negotiation guide relevant ... by lwhi on Thursday October 31, 2024 @11:56AM (#42008149)
Because it is more precise.

'Alternative' or 'option', leave the question 'to what?'.

Re:Is Patrick Mackenzie's salary negotiation guide relevant ... by lotsofpulp on Thursday October 31, 2024 @12:38PM (#42008544)
Unless we’re in a situation where violence concludes every interaction, “negotiated agreement” is the presumed conclusion of every interaction.

I declined this job offer because I had BATNA.

I declined this job offer because I had a better option.

I negotiated more PTO because I had a BATNA.

I negotiated more PTO because I had a better alternative.

Re:Is Patrick Mackenzie's salary negotiation guide relevant ... by lwhi on Thursday October 31, 2024 @12:44PM (#42008590)
It's an educational concept. Not something you'd use in a sentence like that.

I think you're being a pendent.

Re:Is Patrick Mackenzie's salary negotiation guide relevant ... by lotsofpulp on Thursday October 31, 2024 @03:09PM (#42010327)
Sure, but that’s why I originally replied to brtkdotse, since their comment did use it in a sentence like that.
Re:Is Patrick Mackenzie's salary negotiation guide relevant ... by robotresearcher on Friday November 01, 2024 @07:54PM (#42022784)
> I think you're being a pendent.

Oh god help me....

Re:Is Patrick Mackenzie's salary negotiation guide relevant ... by lwhi on Saturday November 02, 2024 @01:26PM (#42027751)
I'm glad someone noticed!

(But a little disappointed my trap wasn't successful ..)

Re:Is Patrick Mackenzie's salary negotiation guide relevant ... by robotresearcher on Saturday November 02, 2024 @05:49PM (#42029455)
Despicable. A pox on your house.
Re:Is Patrick Mackenzie's salary negotiation guide relevant ... by jabbawookiees on Thursday October 31, 2024 @06:25PM (#42012195)
Well you could have a negotiation like so:

Recruiter: The offer is $100k.

Me: I want 120k and WFH.

Recruiter: I checked with the manager. The best we can do is either 120k but you show up every day or 90k remote.

Me: I'm already paid 110k and work remote. Sorry.

Recruiter: Oh, alright. We can't afford that. We'll continue our search with other candidates. Thanks for your time.

Both "options" presented by the recruiter are "alternatives" and they're both "negotiated agreements" (i.e. a meeting in the middle).

BATNA is short for what you get when negotiations fail and you walk away with no deal. (In this case, staying at the 110k remote job is one party's, the other party's is to keep interviewing more candidates.)

I had once had this aversion to neologisms for the sake of them too. Then I took some math classes and understood that saying "ring" is better than saying "commutative group with multiplication satisfying the following axioms...". Ultimately, it's helpful to invoke words that a group of people commonly understands, even if it seems to the uninitiated that it's saying nothing of importance.

The word "BATNA" is used a lot in discussions on negotiations. These books are full of tips on thinking about/finding out your counterpart's BATNA, coming to the negotiation table with a strong BATNA, conveying your BATNA to the other person, etc. In this context, the word/acronym conveys a very specific meaning that unspecialized English words like "option" and "alternative" don't capture.