News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google's TOS doesn't eliminate a user's Fourth Amendment ... by programjames on Wednesday October 30, 2024 @05:48PM (#42000786)
I think their point was they think the law should be based off of harms, not necessarily "morals" (since no one can seem to decide on those).
Re:Google's TOS doesn't eliminate a user's Fourth Amendment ... by int_19h on Wednesday October 30, 2024 @07:29PM (#42001734)
GP is saying that people who want this to be a crime are morally outraged that someone else might disagree, and so it's impossible to have a reasonable debate with them about it. They're probably correct, but it never hurts to try.
Re:Google's TOS doesn't eliminate a user's Fourth Amendment ... by programjames on Wednesday October 30, 2024 @10:30PM (#42002856)
Oof, I fell victim to Poe's law