Re:Google's TOS doesn't eliminate a user's Fourth Amendment ...
by Onavo on Wednesday October 30, 2024 @03:40PM
(#41999315)
And it should be mostly bijective under most conditions. (This is obviously impossible in practice but hashes with common collisions shouldn't be allowed as legal evidence). Also neural/visual hashes like those used by big tech makes things tricky.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google's TOS doesn't eliminate a user's Fourth Amendment ...
by bluGill on Wednesday October 30, 2024 @04:25PM
(#41999831)
The hash in question has many collisions. It it probably enough to get a warrant put it on a warrant, but it may not be enough to get a warrant without some other evidence. (it can be enough evidence to look for other public signs of evidence, or perhaps because there are a number of images that match different hashes)