Re:How the Human Brain Contends with the Strangeness of Zero
by red75prime on Sunday October 27, 2024 @05:36AM
(#41961100)
I'm not a fan of Sapir-Whorf hypothesis. People extend the language to fit their needs, not other way around. "Turning everything into a thing" is probably the inevitable way to accommodate philosophical thinking. Not everything is a thing, but to be able to make anything into an object of consideration and communication you need a word for it and a word is a thing.
Re:How the Human Brain Contends with the Strangeness of Zero
by pwdiscflatmajor on Sunday October 27, 2024 @04:34AM
(#41960797)
...and treating a term for a state of being as if the state we an object, a thing, vs the state a thing is in, is a category mistake (and perhaps one that only happens with overthinking)--like what I might be doing right now? is what I'm doing right now a "thing"? No, right? Because, verbs aren't nouns. Are the states of things things? Are adjectives nouns? Are verbs nouns?
(no, but since in English I can verb my adjectived nouns into all sorts of noun-y verb craziness, nothing can get nouned and verbed out of adjectiving all day long, because English.)
*edited to say feel instead of fill