News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Jeff Bezos killed Washington Post endorsement of Kamala Harris. Parent comment

Re:Jeff Bezos killed Washington Post endorsement of Kamala H... by jll29 on Friday October 25, 2024 @08:18PM (#41951397)
> To be honest only BBC comes into mind when I think about a somewhat impartial medium.

The BBC is pro-UK government, who fund them.

To me only Reuters (disclaimer: I once worked there) and AP come to mind when I think impartial news.

What do others think? https://www.purevpn.com/blog/unbiased-news-sources/

The Guardian is a great source of news, and it has a curageous team of reporters, but even it has its biases. I recommend reading multipe news outlets and being aware what he individual biases might be.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Jeff Bezos killed Washington Post endorsement of Kamala H... by tredfjgkkl543 on Friday October 25, 2024 @08:26PM (#41951443)
> The BBC is pro-UK government, who fund them.

You are not British, are you :-)

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Jeff Bezos killed Washington Post endorsement of Kamala H... by goosejuice on Wednesday October 30, 2024 @11:26AM (#41996073)
I'm not sure the BBC is even pro-BBC.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Jeff Bezos killed Washington Post endorsement of Kamala H... by gotoeleven on Saturday October 26, 2024 @12:25AM (#41952543)
Was it the AP or reuters that shared an office building hamas? Or was it BBC ?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Jeff Bezos killed Washington Post endorsement of Kamala H... by guiriduro on Saturday October 26, 2024 @09:04AM (#41954493)
The Guardian was a reasonably good source of news under Rubsbridger, under Viner its biases have worsened and its most courageous reporters, opinion writers and even cartoonists have been either sidelined or fired. Avoid.
[ Parent | on HN ]