Of course there are attempts and opinions but I'm pointing out that there is absolutely no consensus
They are not taught because of two things. First it just philosophical opinions and the second is that it does not matter when you are actually working with quantum mechanics/ quantum field theory. So it is usually outside the realm of your standard course/s that have a lot to cover anyway.
Re:Yes, we did discover the Higgs
by griffzhowl on Friday October 25, 2024 @11:20AM
(#41946127)
Thanks for the reference! Looks like an intriguing book from a glance at the contents pages
I think such attempts are not widely disseminated / taught to young physicists because older / more experienced ones believe that quantum gravity will re-write the situation anyway. { QG itself seems necessary since in General Relativity you "solve for the metric aka solve for time" and that very same "time" is the background for QFT. So, we don't really understand this model element we call "time" - so elemental to all our ideas of dynamics - without QG. Of course, the most direct quantum gravitational phenomena are at, at present, a subtle experimental scales due to the size of 'G'. This need not remain the case -- once we know what to look for - e.g., https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraunhofer_lines were beginning to reveal atomic quantum physics a full century+ before Planck and barely after Benjamin Franklin-ian electrostatics and long before Maxwellian electrodynamics. }
I'm mostly just trying to strike a less hopeless note for jiggawatts and provide some reading material which might be accessible (if, as noted, probably necessarily preliminary).