Also in 1939, people did not have experience self-organizing into bands of likeminded internet-enabled jerks. I posit this helped avoid civil strife immeasurably.

If you put three people in a room, two clubs will be formed immediately that leave one of them out. Internet has nothing to do with it.

So the two clubs have a membership of exactly 1 person each, and the remainder of exactly 1 person is unaffiliated?

Why not two clubs with 1 permanent member each, with one person swinging between them? Why not one club with 2 or 3 people? Why not 3 "clubs"?

Why must it be as you describe?

You’re gay.

Don’t overthink this

Too late. It remains your move.

I lived next door to a PhD in plant biology, who would almost foam at the mouth from anger about monoclonal farming. I asked him about alternatives...he said without even a thought: "victory gardens." Time for me to find out exactly why. Turns out the USDA brought all the regional managers and all the researchers to get together on very best practices. It has withstood the test of time. My sister in law planted one exactly out of the book. Plant for plant. Not even full sun and the crops explode. Another friend tried it at a rental unit with 5 galllon buckets. A bit screwed, but he also got great results.

Fundamentally a Victory garden is small scale soil managment at its very best. Thanks Gabe.