News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Facebook's e-mail debacle: One 'bug' fix, but rollback im... by eli on Monday July 02, 2012 @10:52PM (#4192269)
I believe Facebook is capable of doing sneaky things to advance their business goals, but Hanlon's razor [1] comes to mind here.

[1] http://www.jargon.net/jargonfile/h/HanlonsRazor.html

Re:Facebook's e-mail debacle: One 'bug' fix, but rollback im... by rhizome on Monday July 02, 2012 @11:37PM (#4192385)
I know what Hanlon's razor is, and I can guarantee you FB Engineering knows what a rollback is and how to know whether you need one or not. I'm not sure where you're getting the idea that they're that stupid.
Re:Facebook's e-mail debacle: One 'bug' fix, but rollback im... by keithpeter on Tuesday July 03, 2012 @04:00AM (#4193041)
Would applying such a 'rollback' involve replacing facebook.com email addresses with the original external domain addresses in the contacts list on the devices affected by the write-over issue?

If so: Facebook have taken private data and placed it in a central location

If not: it isn't a rollback that I understand

Disclaimer: I'm not a programmer

Re:Facebook's e-mail debacle: One 'bug' fix, but rollback im... by rhizome on Tuesday July 03, 2012 @01:05PM (#4195006)
Yes, a (hypothetical) "complete rollback" would involve replacing removed data. Sure, data privacy would be a concern, but it's beside the point that rolling this back would necessitate un-overwriting.
Re:Facebook's e-mail debacle: One 'bug' fix, but rollback im... by Cloven on Tuesday July 03, 2012 @12:39PM (#4194873)
how about 'the evidence on display in front of us'?
Re:Facebook's e-mail debacle: One 'bug' fix, but rollback im... by Devilboy on Tuesday July 03, 2012 @04:41AM (#4193144)
Hanlon's razor is not a law of nature.
Re:Facebook's e-mail debacle: One 'bug' fix, but rollback im... by eli on Tuesday July 03, 2012 @07:50AM (#4193623)
Neither is the opposite.