Re:Math is still catching up to the genius of Ramanujan
by dagw on Tuesday October 22, 2024 @04:52AM
(#41912414)
The first math course as math major in university involved proving that a+b=b+a and that a+(b+c)=(a+b)+c. It's quite fun to go from 'advanced' calculus during the final classes of high school, to "OK, let's consider the expression 1+1=2. What does it actually mean and why is it true?"
Re:Math is still catching up to the genius of Ramanujan
by thaumasiotes on Tuesday October 22, 2024 @07:25AM
(#41913207)
> The first math course as math major in university involved proving that a+b=b+a and that a+(b+c)=(a+b)+c.
Really? What were the axioms?
Re:Math is still catching up to the genius of Ramanujan
by dagw on Tuesday October 22, 2024 @07:32AM
(#41913250)
Basically the Peano axioms
Re:Math is still catching up to the genius of Ramanujan
by thaumasiotes on Tuesday October 22, 2024 @07:43AM
(#41913312)
How did that proof work for rational numbers?
Re:Math is still catching up to the genius of Ramanujan
by dagw on Tuesday October 22, 2024 @08:02AM
(#41913415)
It's been 20+ years, and I don't remember the exact steps the course went thought. But basically we started with defining N using the Peano axioms (although I don't recall the name 'Peano' being mentioned) and proving some basic rules of addition and equality. Then we defined subtraction, multiplication and inverse elements, and constructed Z and Q. From there you get to algebraic groups, and from there you can hand wave a lot of details.
As I said it was literally one of the first math courses we did, so it wasn't super rigorous with all the technical and logical details.
Then in university, there’s Elementary Functional Analysis!