I can certainly say that consumption of news above around 1-2 hours a day in myself and everyone I've had the pleasure to discuss this with is an increasingly bad thing. Especially war! If you spend all of your time just consuming news about things when do you have time to do things like live a fulfilling life or enjoy peaceful human existence. Continuous news is the opposite of peace.
Maybe you're saying in general rather than in one person's life but i'd counter that a mass amount of news in general _is directly_ a mass amount of news in a mass amount of people's lives. Why would there be tons and tons of news unless people were actively consuming more and more of it?
How many hours a day do you spend reading current events and news? Why don't you spend more? Your answer to that question is my rebuttal
In this case, yeah, CNN may give you AI synthetic news sooner rather than later to preempt the inevitable. In fact, all forms of news can, all of a sudden.
I’m not really commenting on whether it’s good or bad really. This may be the last hours of how we’ve all been getting news, shrugs.
This is news about how news as we know it is going away, and there’s more news on that coming 24/7. And that’s just the news on the news.
Idea for OP:
If you treat an HN post and it’s comments as a hivemind, you could do something like ‘Interview with the Hivemind: (insert post topic)”, have the AI ask interview questions where the hivemind can respond from the entire thread. This is to get any post into some kind of known podcast format.
If you intersperse talk about Big Foot throughout that interview for no good reason, you could become the #1 podcast in the world.