AI Detectors Falsely Accuse Students of Cheating–With Big Consequences

Re:AI Detectors Falsely Accuse Students of Cheating–With Big... by VBprogrammer on Monday October 21, 2024 @05:30AM (#41902244)

My ability to write an essay under exam conditions is...poor. Thankfully there were less than a handful of essays I had to write as part of my undergraduate CS degree and I only remember one under exam conditions.

I think it's probably more concerning that spitting out the most generic mathematically formulaic bullshit on a subject is likely to get a decent mark. In that case what are we actually testing for?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AI Detectors Falsely Accuse Students of Cheating–With Big... by thechao on Monday October 21, 2024 @08:02AM (#41903205)

Conformance.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AI Detectors Falsely Accuse Students of Cheating–With Big... by bigfudge on Monday October 21, 2024 @08:50AM (#41903610)

Amusingly, willingness and capacity to conform to a system you are paying $30k a year for is a pretty good proxy for general intelligence. So maybe it's not that bad?!

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AI Detectors Falsely Accuse Students of Cheating–With Big... by amanaplanacanal on Monday October 21, 2024 @01:27PM (#41906293)

It depends on what we think education is for. If the goal is to teach students, it's not so great. If the goal is to signal future employers the intelligence of the student, Maybe that's ok. But maybe the future employers should be paying the tuition instead of the student.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:AI Detectors Falsely Accuse Students of Cheating–With Big... by bigfudge on Wednesday October 23, 2024 @02:37AM (#41922425)

Sorry - it was tongue in cheek, but reflecting what university seems to be for these days rather than what it should be for.

[ Parent | on HN ]