> So you'd understand technical articles by women are plenty, but they're not immediately obvious.
Actually, we have insufficient evidence to know that they are in fact plenty. However, we also have insufficient evidence to say they are rare.
Also, I think you mean moot, not mute. ;)
And hopefully, if you understand all that, you won't ask be asking "where are the technical contributions from women?" in the first place. So the question is mute, which is why she didn't answer.