News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The C23 edition of Modern C is now available for free by wang_li on Wednesday October 16, 2024 @11:53AM (#41860562)
> loop: move.b (a0)+,d0 move.b d0,(a1)+

...

> loop: mov al,[rsi] mov [rdi],al

This hurts my brain. When we invent time machines I'm going to use it to go back and slap whoever at intel came up with that operand order.

Re:The C23 edition of Modern C is now available for free by spc476 on Friday October 18, 2024 @02:11AM (#41876747)
It hurts less if you think of it like assignment:

    al = [rsi]
    [rdi] = al
Re:The C23 edition of Modern C is now available for free by int_19h on Friday October 18, 2024 @11:35AM (#41880372)
memcpy etc also take the destination as their first argument, and it mirrors the usual way we write assignments. Personally I always found Intel syntax to be more straightforward, but I think it's ultimately down to whatever one was exposed to first.

I wonder sometimes why we keep insisting on the "OP ARG, ARG" format in general for assembly. Why not something like `MOV X -> Y` that would make it absolutely clear and unambiguous? For that matter, why not `COPY X -> Y`, since that's what it actually does?