Re:The C23 edition of Modern C is now available for free
by PaulDavisThe1st on Tuesday October 15, 2024 @11:49PM
(#41855426)
What they mean is this:
struct Foo {
int a;
float b;
std::string c;
};
Foo foo;
std::cout << foo;
Re:The C23 edition of Modern C is now available for free
by wakawaka28 on Wednesday October 16, 2024 @04:23AM
(#41856808)
I know what reflection is of course. C++ makes it easy to implement IO. If you're asking for a reflection-based solution with less effort, you are practically asking for zero extra code. Anyway, C++ does not yet have reflection but who's to say how anyone wants any particular data to be dumped? A default implementation is nice but less useful than you make it sound. In any case, there are libraries approximating what you described (usually with macros and stuff) and reflection is totally coming at some point.
Hindsight is 20/20, remember that. Streams are not that bad of an idea and have been working fine for decades. You haven't named a problem with it other than the fact the operators are used for other stuff in other contexts. But operator overloading is a feature of C++ so most operators, even the comma operator, can be something other than what you expect.
>The biggest problem is that today C++ doesn't have a way to implement this for your own types easily, Barry illustrates a comfortable way this could work in C++ 26 via reflection which on that issue closes the gap with Rust's #[derive(Debug)].
You can trivially implement input and output for your own types with streams.
You appear to be a Rust guy whose motive is to throw shade on C++ for things that are utterly banal and subjective issues.