News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Life expectancy rise in rich countries slows down: took 30 years to prove. Parent comment

Re:Life expectancy rise in rich countries slows down: took 3... by joe_the_user on Tuesday October 15, 2024 @05:26PM (#41853285)
We're talking years of increased life expectancy.

Huh? Statins are a medication type in which increases in life expectancy are extremely hard to point to all. I think they're almost a "poster child" for medications that correct a problem to an extent but whose overall benefit is quite dubious.

(and given that these medications were highly prescribed before any long term studies were finish - creating considerable incentive for people to find benefit - I'd personally wager they are overall harmful but that's me guessing - the main point is they definitely aren't boost-life-expectancy-by-years drugs but probably aren't reduce-life-expectancy-by-years drugs either, given the studies)

Link from google: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3531501/

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Life expectancy rise in rich countries slows down: took 3... by pessimizer on Tuesday October 15, 2024 @05:53PM (#41853507)
Every few years, the lobby inserts op-eds insisting that statins are of such indisputable benefit and zero side effects that they should go into the water supply. I understand this from the companies themselves, but I have no idea which studies are convincing normal people that this is sane.

There is no lobbying like the lobbying for massively selling classes of drugs of dubious effect.

[ Parent | on HN ]