News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Google Funding Construction of Seven U.S. Nuclear Reactors. Parent comment

Re:Google Funding Construction of Seven U.S. Nuclear Reactors by otherme123 on Monday October 14, 2024 @04:38PM (#41841710)
I can't deduce "implied" when the comments are very, very explicit against solar and wind, not a single word about gas. But somehow I have to read between the lines that they actually meant to criticise fossils.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google Funding Construction of Seven U.S. Nuclear Reactors by boomboomsubban on Monday October 14, 2024 @11:35PM (#41844661)
Do you think everyone pronuclear is a climate change denier? It's so incredibly clear who's the "bad guy" here.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google Funding Construction of Seven U.S. Nuclear Reactors by otherme123 on Saturday October 19, 2024 @09:55AM (#41887793)
No, never said that and never implied that. That's, in fact, a strawman fallacy, distorting my argument badly to attack me.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google Funding Construction of Seven U.S. Nuclear Reactors by boomboomsubban on Monday October 21, 2024 @02:57PM (#41907212)
It wasn't an attack. The idea that it's hard to pick up on pronuclear folks being anti-fossil fuels when the entire debate is about how meet our energy needs in the face of climate change is absurd.
[ Parent | on HN ]