Yeah, never understood the charm of it either. My favorite is Bruno (https://github.com/usebruno/bruno), one can even commit its text-based files to version control. Insomnia is probably better but had a major fiasco last year - https://github.com/Kong/insomnia/issues/6577

hmm looks like they forked the pre-enshittified version of insomnia https://github.com/ArchGPT/insomnium

What you linked to seems to be in archive and read-only mode already.

Bruno didn’t exist until ~2yrs ago and was created as a reactionary alternative to Postman’s changes. What did you use before that?

I used curl before that. But I can see how curl will be intimidating for non-engineers.

Now, I recommend Bruno to even non-engineers.

Notwithstanding your judgment of others’ ability to use curl - I wouldn’t compare API clients to curl at all.

Clients like Postman/Bruno provide private/shared request libraries, detailed customization of the request/response, automated load and behavior testing, syntax highlighting and formatting, pretty printing and so much more.

> Clients like Postman/Bruno provide private/shared request libraries, detailed customization of the request/response, automated load and behavior testing, syntax highlighting and formatting, pretty printing and so much more.

For all engineers

  - detailed customization of the request/response - Python scripts
  - syntax highlighting - bat
  - pretty printing - jq
  - automated load and behavior testing - several specialized tools

This feels like a worse version of: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9224

well played I guess

but a side question, how did you find that comment? is there a listing of historic hn comments somewhere?

The comparison to Dropbox is incorrect. But rather than trying to explain that, I will wait a few years and let the market decide whether my concerns are legitimate.

> it's literally just an http client with a UI, better luck next time

This is the exact toxic dismissive attitude that leads to OSS software going the payment-gated route.

isn't that the point of OSS software? vendor makes a bunch of user-hostile changes, people get pissed and fork it.

if they wanted to be hostile towards users, then OSS was a mistake

The reason we end up with user hostile changes, is because the dev user community is cannibalistically stingy. This cycle will continue forever, until people stop dismissing others work as “curl with a UI” or “curl with FTP” and refusing to pay for anything.