Re:Germany's 49-euro ticket resulted in significant modal sh...
by ericd on Saturday October 12, 2024 @05:18PM
(#41822716)
The only carbon capture/sequestration method I’m aware of without significant tradeoffs outside of price is direct air capture, and last I saw, that clocked in at $600-1200/ton (Climeworks). So maybe not such a terrible deal?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Germany's 49-euro ticket resulted in significant modal sh...
by DoreenMichele on Saturday October 12, 2024 @06:47PM
(#41823394)
Wetlands do a better job of carbon sequestration than trees.
Globally, we've lost 85 percent of our wetlands since the 1700s.
Maybe we should restore them.
Re:Germany's 49-euro ticket resulted in significant modal sh...
by hedora on Sunday October 13, 2024 @01:26AM
(#41825392)
The startups in this space were targeting $100/ton before the recent inflation hit.
It turns out if you divide the $/ton by 100, you get $/gallon of gas equivalent.
Burning a gallon of gas emits 20 lbs of CO2 (most of the weight is in the oxygen), and a ton is 2000 lbs.
Anyway, at $6-12 dollars per gallon of gasoline, direct air capture is clearly much worse than just not burning oil. At $1-2, it’s less than the current gasoline taxes in the US.