Re:Indian entrepreneur, industrialist, and philanthropist, R...
by addicted on Thursday October 10, 2024 @05:02AM
(#41796987)
> Despite repeated reminders, the company (Tata Steel) didn’t comply with the rules,” the confidential letter reads.
> And when threatened with recourse to the law, “the company started submitting the correct royalty.
IOW they continued doing what they had always been doing, and ignored a bunch of letters saying they should pay more. When the government took a more serious approach they started paying the royalty they were supposed to under the new rules.
> And when threatened with recourse to the law, “the company started submitting the correct royalty.
IOW they continued doing what they had always been doing, and ignored a bunch of letters saying they should pay more. When the government took a more serious approach they started paying the royalty they were supposed to under the new rules.
Not a great look, but hardly beyond the norm.