News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:On the Nature of Time by yarg on Tuesday October 08, 2024 @11:14PM (#41784163)
I think that time isn't what we think it is - but I don't think it's all already set; rather I think that the past can be constrained by the future just as the future is constrained by the past.

I don't think that there's spooky action at a distance (it's fundamentally equivalent to retrocausality, and the consequences of the distant foreign event cannot outpace its light cone anyway).

I think its a superposition of states of a closed time-like curve thing being fleshed out as its contradictions are resolved and interactions are permitted between its colocated non-contradictory aspects.

But I'm not a physicist, so that's probably all just bullshit anyway.

There are no comments on this comment yet.