Re:ABC News hacks into popular robot vacuum, watches owner t...
by bmicraft on Tuesday October 08, 2024 @06:07PM
(#41782285)
Yeah okay, but that doesn't mean _cameras_ are bad (which, to be fair, they are in Teslas case), it means the algorithms feeding on them are.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:ABC News hacks into popular robot vacuum, watches owner t...
by Alupis on Tuesday October 08, 2024 @06:21PM
(#41782390)
It means the cameras can be fooled by things LIDAR cannot be. Such as smoke, glare, reflections, optical illusions/mirage, etc.
If the algorithms are fed with incorrect data, they will produce incorrect results - such as driving full-speed into a parked, white colored, semi-truck.
Re:ABC News hacks into popular robot vacuum, watches owner t...
by bmicraft on Wednesday October 09, 2024 @11:27PM
(#41795201)
And lidar can't tell the difference between a plastic bag and a rock, what's your point?
Re:ABC News hacks into popular robot vacuum, watches owner t...
by Alupis on Thursday October 10, 2024 @01:25PM
(#41801107)
One can (and has been) fooled into thinking there is no object in the path - the other might be extra sensitive to any object in it's path.
I'll let you stew on that one for a minute...
Re:ABC News hacks into popular robot vacuum, watches owner t...
by bmicraft on Thursday October 10, 2024 @05:48PM
(#41803931)
> I'll let you stew on that one for a minute...
Then that means the vision processing isn't far along yet to be viable for a car. There is no fundamental reason why it couldn't work though. With either stereoscopic vision or more temporal processing you could obviously detect when things are only painted on a wall surface, with both there really is no excuse to still fail except limited processing power.