Re:Congress fights to keep AM radio in cars
by habinero on Monday October 07, 2024 @05:25AM
(#41764212)
I really don't think mandate to include a -- let's be generous -- $1 AM radio in a car in case of emergencies will lead to communism.
Re:Congress fights to keep AM radio in cars
by consteval on Monday October 07, 2024 @11:31AM
(#41767029)
These people act as those cost analysis doesn't exist. It costs close to nothing to provide a radio, but the benefits can be huge.
Our government should step in when it makes sense. We determine if it makes sense via cost analysis and risk analysis. This is why the communism slippery slope argument doesn't work.
For example, banning public smoking along with other measures have saved millions of lives in the long run. Of course smoking is a personal choice, but it's also addictive and dangerous. It is sometimes beneficial to override people's "personal choice" if the benefit is big enough and the cost low enough. Ultimately, pretty much everyone is now grateful public smoking is gone.
It's a quirk or random fact of history that they got put into cars but not houses, but that doesn't mean we should get rid of it. It's smart and reasoning people like you and me that look at this and think "ugh, no need to have it in a car, we can have it in a bug out bag and it'll make cars cheaper, etc". But that kind of thinking is wrong for society past a certain point.
Before we know it, we'll own nothing, we'll rely on Daddy Government for everything, and we'll be happy! Maybe they'll let us own a Digital Government-Issued Codec-Infused Satellite Radio®, so they can reach us at all times.