Re:When Data Is Missing, Scientists Guess. Then Guess Again
by clircle on Saturday October 05, 2024 @06:51PM
(#41753488)
Does any living statistician come close to the level of Donald Rubin in terms of research impact? Missing data analysis, causal inference, EM algorithm, any probably more. He just walks around creating new subfields.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:When Data Is Missing, Scientists Guess. Then Guess Again
by selimthegrim on Saturday October 05, 2024 @07:28PM
(#41753632)
Efron?
Re:When Data Is Missing, Scientists Guess. Then Guess Again
by richrichie on Sunday October 06, 2024 @03:47AM
(#41755513)
& Tibshirani
Re:When Data Is Missing, Scientists Guess. Then Guess Again
by selimthegrim on Sunday October 06, 2024 @03:25PM
(#41759514)
Stein too
Re:When Data Is Missing, Scientists Guess. Then Guess Again
by aquafox on Sunday October 06, 2024 @01:51AM
(#41755051)
Andrew Gelman?
Re:When Data Is Missing, Scientists Guess. Then Guess Again
by nabla9 on Sunday October 06, 2024 @06:23AM
(#41756142)
Gelman has contributed to Bayesianism, hierarchial models and Stan is great, but that's not even close to what Rubin has done.
ps. Gelman was Rubin's doctoral student.
Re:When Data Is Missing, Scientists Guess. Then Guess Again
by selectionbias on Sunday October 06, 2024 @06:04AM
(#41756070)
Also approximate Bayesian computation, principal stratification, and the Bayesian Bootstrap.