To me, it looks like you have some experience with the topic and believe that it is very hard to build something like the device in question, but which properties of the solution make you so certain?
I don't take advertising at face value, even if that advertising might appeal to sci-fi sensibilities. Your question has an air of "well you can't PROVE the flying spaghetti monster is false."
However, I agree with you that this is very thin ice. Given the selection of books used as decoration in the video, the authors seem to have more of a business background [2] than one of psychology.
I don't like calling someone a liar when no evidence is present (either way). I would rather say: 'Bold claims, can you prove it?'
[1]: https://github.com/StarmoonAI/Starmoon/blob/main/.env.exampl...
Ours are indeed bold claims and we have updated some copies on the website to update our core value prop
> Do you have a single psychologist on your staff that signed off on any of this?
We've been talking to pediatricians at portland hospital and cromwell hospital in london to support the "safe for all ages" claim but I agree that we want to back all our claims with data
> It is not acceptable for AI hucksters to lie about their product in order to make a quick buck
You created a fake/throwaway just to make posts with this kind of cheap insults?
> With a platform that supports real-time conversations safe for all ages...Our AI platform can analyse human-speech and emotion, and respond with empathy, offering supportive conversations and personalized learning assistance.
These claims are certainly false. It is not acceptable for AI hucksters to lie about their product in order to make a quick buck, regardless of how many nice words they say about emotional growth.
Do you have a single psychologist on your staff that signed off on any of this? Telling lies about commercial products will get you in trouble with regulators, and it truly seems like you deserve to get in trouble.