> These things sound way too specific to just perform on a hunch, and even then, you might get the analysis wrong if you don't have the insider tip to check your math.
This is suggested as the parallel construction for the actual insider info.
That actually is public information. I know it's hard for your typical member of the public to obtain, but the key thing is that it didn't wasn't communicated directly by someone working at the company. That's legitimate and no parallel construction is needed (except to mislead your competitors – maybe that's the real motivation).