News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Were RNNs All We Needed? by mr_toad on Thursday October 03, 2024 @08:40PM (#41736639)
> can conceivably fit a curve with a single, huge layer

I think you need a hidden layer. I’ve never seen a universal approximation theorem for a single layer network.

Re:Were RNNs All We Needed? by dongecko on Friday October 04, 2024 @04:44AM (#41739235)
I second that thought. There is a pretty well cited paper from the late eighties called "Multilayer Feedforward Networks are Universal Approximators". It shows that a feedforward network with a single hidden layer containing a finite number of neurons can approximate any continuous function. For non continous function additional layers are needed.
Re:Were RNNs All We Needed? by ted_dunning on Saturday October 05, 2024 @11:45AM (#41750670)
Minsky and Papert showed that single layer perceptrons suffer from exponentially bad scaling to reach a certain accuracy for certain problems.

Multi-layer substantially changes the scaling.