News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Gumroad Didn't Choose Htmx by jonathan-adly on Thursday October 03, 2024 @03:48PM (#41734237)
My startup using htmx was there - and it was acquired successfully.

They migrated pretty quick to react after the acquisition due to team dynamics (offshore big teams - seeped into JS heavy client, thin server culture). htmx was a struggle there as well.

It worked amazing for us as a small team where everyone was full stack and I always build using htmx-first now. But, it is a struggle for folks who have been working in React-like patterns for 5+ years and never experienced the bless of MVC apps.

Re:Why Gumroad Didn't Choose Htmx by WD-42 on Thursday October 03, 2024 @04:09PM (#41734449)
Kinda wild that there is an entire generation of web devs for whom server side rendering is actually the new, strange thing.
Re:Why Gumroad Didn't Choose Htmx by insidstwr on Saturday October 05, 2024 @07:36AM (#41749190)
Ssr is really about React. Rendering referring to HTML generation using react.

Probably the old school thing is "serving a page"

Re:Why Gumroad Didn't Choose Htmx by fsndz on Thursday October 03, 2024 @05:46PM (#41735401)
convenient. I would have liked taking a look at your apps built only using htmx
Re:Why Gumroad Didn't Choose Htmx by createaccount99 on Thursday October 03, 2024 @08:54PM (#41736722)
> the bless of MVC apps.

haha, good one

Re:Why Gumroad Didn't Choose Htmx by prisenco on Thursday October 03, 2024 @09:05PM (#41736781)
| They migrated pretty quick to react

One advantage of htmx (along with web components and standard html+css) is that migrating to anything else is much easier than the other way around. A rewrite from an htmx app to a React app can be trivial. A rewrite from React to anything else will not be.