> These guys were paying ZERO for their content and they still couldn't make it work.
Not true. They offered a bounty of $100 and a free subscription for photos and stories selected to be run in the print edition.
Not true. They offered a bounty of $100 and a free subscription for photos and stories selected to be run in the print edition.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/120355
I guess not?
I'm also kind of bummed out by this news. These guys were paying ZERO for their content and they still couldn't make it work.
Also, I agree that there's something odd about them not just going web-only + a pay fee for super users. How many people do you need to run that site? 3?