News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bots, so many bots by nkrisc on Wednesday October 02, 2024 @04:50AM (#41718535)
There's a nearly fool-proof solution: manually verify every submission.

You can use automated systems as a first line of defense against spam, and then hire people to manually verify every submission that makes it through. You can even use that as opportunity to ensure a certain quality of submission, even if it was submitted by a person.

Any legitimate submissions that get caught in the initial spam filter can use a manual appeal process (perhaps emailing and pleading their case which will go into a queue to be manually reviewed).

Sure, it's not necessary easy and submissions may take some time to appear on the site, but there would be essentially zero spam and low-quality content.

Re:Bots, so many bots by bitwizeshift on Wednesday October 02, 2024 @06:14AM (#41718970)
The article never talked about bot-generated products, only bot generated comments and upvotes. How does manual review address this exactly?
Re:Bots, so many bots by qup on Wednesday October 02, 2024 @06:07AM (#41718927)
The bots are commenting and voting, not submitting products.
Re:Bots, so many bots by mschuster91 on Wednesday October 02, 2024 @06:50AM (#41719170)
> You can use automated systems as a first line of defense against spam, and then hire people to manually verify every submission that makes it through. You can even use that as opportunity to ensure a certain quality of submission, even if it was submitted by a person.

The problem is, once you do manual upfront moderation, you lose a lot of the legal protections that UGC-hosting sites enjoy - manual approval means you are accepting the liability for anything that is published.

Re:Bots, so many bots by nkrisc on Wednesday October 02, 2024 @07:50AM (#41719549)
That's a good point, and perhaps a flaw in safe-harbor laws for UGC. It's a bit all or nothing, isn't it?