News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Open Music Encyclopedia by BLKNSLVR on Monday September 30, 2024 @06:49PM (#41702946)
Dare I invoke the CDDB transition to Gracenote and their kidnapping and subsequent licensing and gatekeeping of a swathe of publically provided data.
Re:The Open Music Encyclopedia by mmooss on Monday September 30, 2024 @07:07PM (#41703055)
Could CDDB and similar have prevented such things with better licenses?
Re:The Open Music Encyclopedia by BLKNSLVR on Monday September 30, 2024 @09:59PM (#41704001)
I think the only way to avoid a CDDB is to make the entire database downloadable so that someone, or a group of someones, is able to re-create it in case of disaster.

I think in the case of "great, open service" selling, the new buyer can just change the licensing, and you're out of luck. If there is a license that compels them to maintain some level of availability, you can trust them to cut it down to the absolute minimum, including rate limiting access down to a level of pointlessness.

Re:The Open Music Encyclopedia by sumtechguy on Tuesday October 01, 2024 @08:25AM (#41707476)
Yes, if I remember correctly it was one of the reasons the CC licenses were created? But I could be remembering wrong.
Re:The Open Music Encyclopedia by aerozol on Monday October 07, 2024 @12:36AM (#41762849)
Yes, that is why the MetaBrainz Foundation was created - good luck “purchasing” the MusicBrainz database :)