News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Visual Studio Code is designed to fracture by monsieurbanana on Monday September 30, 2024 @03:33AM (#41694489)
> The client, accessing remote repos, is wildly insecure, by design

Who's the best kid in the block regarding third-party extensions security?

There's really not much standing in front of a supply-chain attack for my editor of choice, emacs. Most people use a community extensions aggregator that also directly fetches from git repositories. The only slim advantage we have is that I'm sure a much higher % of emacs users would actually look into the source code of the extensions they pull.

Re:Visual Studio Code is designed to fracture by alexhutcheson on Monday September 30, 2024 @09:57AM (#41697136)
If you want to be cautious, I have somewhat higher confidence in the versions of Emacs packages published on the Debian repositories[1] than the ones on ELPA/MELPA.

The downside is that not every package is packaged for Debian, and the versions are a bit stale.

https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=ELPA+&searchon=n...

Re:Visual Studio Code is designed to fracture by monsieurbanana on Tuesday October 01, 2024 @11:25AM (#41709657)
That's a bit of an understatement, about 1% of all emacs packages are in there :)
Re:Visual Studio Code is designed to fracture by amluto on Monday September 30, 2024 @09:58AM (#41697147)
vscode tunnel is already a massive step up from vscode remote SSH here.