News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sitina1 Open-Source Camera by yjftsjthsd-h on Monday September 30, 2024 @12:26AM (#41693556)
Right, no, obviously a dedicated device can power up faster than a general purpose computer. My point was that a general purpose computer can come out of sleep fast enough to be used in a camera, while maintaining acceptable tradeoffs in the process.
Re:Sitina1 Open-Source Camera by girvo on Monday September 30, 2024 @03:39AM (#41694538)
Ah right apologies, I misunderstood what you were saying. Yeah absolutely, though it does require the SoC for the "phone camera" to not be under-powered, which unfortunately for the attempts so far, they usually have been
Re:Sitina1 Open-Source Camera by numpad0 on Monday September 30, 2024 @08:46AM (#41696523)
Digital camera SoCs are actually multi-core ARM with a DSP on bus and tons of RAM, and actually do what GP proposes(boots up and goes to sleep when battery is inserted). Some runs Linux, some really obscure RTOS. Lots of SoCs are OEM'd, but no one talks who supplies who. All those cheap plastic looking body shells are paper thin cast magnesium in black paint, not even aluminum. Some has Peltier based active cooling for years.

The bunches of hackers behind those... they don't like talking to anyone on anything unless you're asking about marketed features on finished products, or you show a badge or a business card they recognize. So the Internet never knows.

Re:Sitina1 Open-Source Camera by girvo on Monday September 30, 2024 @07:43PM (#41703285)
That I'm actually aware of; I was talking about the Samsung Galaxy NX and the Yongnou YN455, both of which have kind of underpowered SoCs driving the android side of it, sadly. The YN455 less so, but still.