News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Gavin Newsom vetoes SB 1047. Parent comment

Re:Gavin Newsom vetoes SB 1047 by gdiamos on Sunday September 29, 2024 @10:17PM (#41692864)
Claude, SSI, Grok, GPT, Llama, …

Should we crown one the king?

Or perhaps it is better to let them compete?

Perhaps advanced AI capability will motivate advanced AI safety capability?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Gavin Newsom vetoes SB 1047 by Maken on Monday September 30, 2024 @03:46AM (#41694585)
What are the economic incentives for AI safety?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Gavin Newsom vetoes SB 1047 by fat_cantor on Monday September 30, 2024 @04:04AM (#41694679)
It's an interesting thought that as AI advances, and becomes more capable of human destruction, programmers, bots and politicians will work together to create safety for a large quantity of humans
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Gavin Newsom vetoes SB 1047 by fifilura on Monday September 30, 2024 @05:19AM (#41695124)
"AI defense corps"
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Gavin Newsom vetoes SB 1047 by jnaz343 on Monday September 30, 2024 @09:11AM (#41696723)
You think they want to compete? None of them want to compete. They want to be a protected monopoly.
[ Parent | on HN ]