News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Gavin Newsom vetoes SB 1047 by hn_throwaway_99 on Sunday September 29, 2024 @06:29PM (#41691363)
Yeah, I think the argument that "this just hurts open models" makes no sense given the supporters/detractors of this bill.

The thing that large companies care the most about in the legal realm is certainty. They're obviously going to be a big target of lawsuits regardless, so they want to know that legislation is clear as to the ways they can act - their biggest fear is that you get a good "emotional sob story" in front of a court with a sympathetic jury. It sounded like this legislation was so vague that it would attract a hoard of lawyers looking for a way they can argue these big companies didn't take "reasonable" care.

Re:Gavin Newsom vetoes SB 1047 by SonOfLilit on Sunday September 29, 2024 @06:40PM (#41691454)
Sob stories are definitely not covered by the text of the bill. The "critical harm" clause (ctrl-f this comment section for a full quote) is all about nuclear weapons and massive hacks and explicitly excludes "just" someone dying or getting injured with very clear language.