Re:AlphaChip transformed computer chip design
by anna-gabriella on Wednesday October 02, 2024 @07:30PM
(#41725902)
I am not associated with this other account. You are just making things up about people, papers, and chips.
Re:AlphaChip transformed computer chip design
by negativeonehalf on Thursday October 03, 2024 @02:23AM
(#41727830)
You made two accounts, at the same time, using the same toxic naming scheme. You have even admittedly openly to reposting to avoid prior flaggings (e.g. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41683073).
Re:AlphaChip transformed computer chip design
by anna-gabriella on Sunday October 06, 2024 @02:46AM
(#41755292)
You are bullying and lying. Please kindly stop bullying and remove comments with lies. Thank you very much.
I think it is time for you to take a deep breath and think about what you are doing and why.
You seem to be obsessed with the idea that this work is overrated. MediaTek and Google don't think so, and use it in production for their chips, including TPU, Dimensity, Axion, and others. If you're right and they're wrong, using this method loses them money. If it's the other way around, then using this method makes them gain money.
Please read PG's post and ask yourself if it applies to you: https://www.paulgraham.com/fh.html
Chatterjee settled his case. He has moved on. This is not some product being sold -- it is a free, open-source tool. People who see value in it use it; others don't, and so they don't. This is how it always works, and it's fine.